tablecontents

=**Proposed Outline**=


 * Introduction (Denise)
 * In response to Federal Mandate - NCLB
 * Federal Definition
 * Rationale for our Position (Denise, Karen F.)
 * 21st century skills
 * DE Recommended Curriculum
 * State of the State (Wayne and Wendy)
 * LoTi Data
 * Equipment levels
 * What we have access to (Internet, VC)
 * Data: Number of 8th gr students proficient in tech literacy
 * Data: Variety of ways that districts are calculating tech literacy
 * Responsibilities (see CT) (Linda and Jacqui)
 * DOE
 * Districts
 * Schools
 * Educators
 * Teacher Prep Programs
 * Parents/Guardians
 * Our Beliefs (Tina, Karen F., Karen H.)
 * Integrated into curriculum/across grade levels
 * CSGC
 * Delaware Recommended Curriculum
 * NETS for Students
 * Include choices
 * Teacher tech competency
 * Teacher accountability
 * Tech should be a part of assessment rubrics
 * NETS for Teachers
 * Advocate fidelity of implementation
 * Close (TENTATIVE)
 * Restate argument
 * Plan of action
 * Recommendations for future actions

http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Research/Reports/Technology_Literacy_White_Paper_1995_/Technology_Literacy_for_the_Nation_and_for_Its_Citizens.htm **The Effect of Technology on Teaching and Learning** http://www.lindanewell.net/5005-1.pdf http://www.lindanewell.net/5005-1.pdf
 * __Initial References:__**
 * ISTE White Paper**
 * Connecticut** **Reference**